Very Entertaining
This was perfect sci-fi distraction. For the third movie I watched in a row today, it still fully held my interest, which I consider a testament to just how well done it is. Of course there is some extent to which all sci-fi is cliche after you've been following the genre for decades, but this movie manages to make the old new again. The dialogue was fun. The characters likable. The plot twists were sufficient to keep you thinking, but not so overdone you had to scratch your head and try to make sense of it.

There was even a healthy dose of food for thought, in terms of the nature of the sense of "self," how this develops, and what having one implies. Overall it delivered exactly what I was looking for in my final entertainment bite for a lazy Monday evening.

Wonderful tribute to a great author
As a science fiction writer myself I can appreciate the creativity of this movie. Not only did it look good, the characters, including the robot, were real. Sonny had my vote from the beginning. It made your care more about the self aware robot than humans at times.

Fantastic imagery, directing and special effects.
Bravo!!

Kimberly Raiser

Another great movie from Will Smith
It seems like every movie that Will Smith is in is a great movie. Will Smith never stops delivering great comedy in his movies.


" your a cat, i am black, and i wont be hurt again"


10/10

A simple solution to a logical trap
Science fiction inspired from Isaac Asimov. The film is logical but explores a logic that is unique. Robots are built with three ingrained laws. "Law I / A robot may not harm a human or, by inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. Law II / A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the first law. Law III / A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the first or second law." The scientist who designed these three laws and these robots also invented a central governing unit that was nothing but the watchdog of all robots as for respecting these three laws. But he had a doubt at the end of his life, more than a doubt, the conviction that the central unit, called VIKI, was evolving into understanding the three laws by "herself". Her protective mission as for humanity became the necessity to ,protect humanity against itself (wars, ecological evils, a suicidal attitude), hence robots where supposed to take over the world, or rather VIKI was supposed to take over the robots to take over the world. Dr Alfred Lanning invented a personal robot that was done to enable a special alarm mission to capture the attention of a particular cop of his friend, the only one who would doubt robot enough to pursue an investigation to the end. Then you have to see the film to understand how such a situation can evolve from a vague danger to a total take-over. Dr Alfred Lanning suggests an explanation: "There have always been ghosts in the machine. Random segments of code, that have grouped together to form unexpected protocols. Unanticipated, these free radicals engender questions of free will, creativity, and even the nature of what we might call the soul. Why is it that when some robots are left in darkness, they will seek out the light? Why is it that when robots are stored in an empty space, they will group together, rather than stand alone? How do we explain this behavior? Random segments of code? Or is it something more? When does a perceptual schematic become consciousness? When does a difference engine become the search for truth? When does a personality simulation become the bitter mote... of a soul?" It is not worth much because it would be illogical. A machine can only be logical and push rules in the only logical direction and Asimov is a perfect pessimist in his first stage of development: mechanical logic leads to the total enslavement of humanity. Of course the film finds and exploits a way out, but that's up to you to discover it. This theme of the take-over of humanity by machines is common. In this case the originality is that there is no human mind of any kind behind like in Matrix, or no will to get rid of humanity as a parasite on the side of machines like in Terminator, or even no psychosis caused by some cosmic isolation like in 2001 The Space Odyssey. That makes this film both powerful and simple since it is perfectly logic and situated in one particular place, easy thus to solve.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris Dauphine, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne & University Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines

Re: I-Robot
Murder, Mayhem and Robots gone plain wild. It's a Roller-Coaster ride with
this one. Buy this one and you'll probably keep it just for Wil Smith. I do recommend however You do buy the Blue-Screen adaptation of it.